[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141015100949.GA30089@1wt.eu>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:09:49 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>
Cc: sandeep.kumar@...escale.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yue.Tao@...driver.com,
guang.yang@...driver.com, joe@...ches.com, festevam@...il.com,
richardcochran@...il.com, clarocq@...il.com,
yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn, claudiu.manoil@...escale.com,
roy.xu@...wei.com, sky.wangfeng@...wei.com,
Zhu Yanjun <Yanjun.Zhu@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gianfar: disable vlan tag insertion by default on 2.6.x
Hi Zhu,
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 06:00:33PM +0800, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> In commit f43c75d4b6[gianfar: disable TX vlan based on kernel 2.6.x],
> gianfar nic disables TX vlan. But gianfar nic enables vlan tag
> insertion by default. This will lead to unusable connections on
> some configurations. Since vlan tag insertion is disabled by default
> and it is not enabled any longer, it is not necessary to disable it again.
>
> Zhu Yanjun (1):
> gianfar: disable vlan tag insertion by default
>
> drivers/net/gianfar.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.9.1
There's no patch in this e-mail. Since you sent another e-mail with almost
the same subject, I'm confused, it's unclear to me whether I only need to
apply the patch in the other one with this commit message or if it's just
that you accidently dropped the patch when sending this e-mail. Could you
please enlighten me ?
Thanks,
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists