[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <543E9B4B.9040608@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:05:31 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Lockdep warning with init_espfix_ap()
On 10/15/2014 09:03 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>
>> It is kind of a messy situation, because this code needs to allocate
>> memory but is run before the secondary CPU is fully up. As such, it is
>> a false positive, at least in some ways.
>
> Interesting -- FWIW, I can reproduce this 100% of the time on _one_ system. It
> isn't a big deal and likely just worth noting at this point. I *always* see it
> when bringing up CPU 64 (of 128).
>
... because that is the first CPU which needs to allocate memory.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists