[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.11.1410152310080.11974@adalberg.ut.ee>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:11:34 +0300 (EEST)
From: Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux.com,
penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unaligned accesses in SLAB etc.
> >> The gcc-4.9 case is interesting, are you saying that a gcc-4.9 compiled
> >> kernel works fine on other systems?
> >
> > Yes, all USII based systems work fine with Debian gcc-4.9, as does
> > T2000. Of USIII* systems, V210 and V440 exhibit the boot hang with
> > gcc-4.9 and V480 crashes wit FATAL exception during boot that is
> > probably earlier than the gcc boot hang so I do not know about V480 and
> > gcc-4.9. V240 not tested because of fan failures, V245 is in the queue
> > for setup but not tested so far.
>
> Ok, on the V210/V440 can you boot with "-p" on the kernel boot command
> line and post the log? Let's start by seeing how far it gets, maybe
> we can figure out roughly where it dies.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/sparclinux/msg12238.html and
http://www.spinics.net/lists/sparclinux/msg12468.html are my relevant
posts about it. Should I get something more? It would be easy because of
ALOM.
--
Meelis Roos (mroos@...ux.ee)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists