linux-kernel - Re: arm: JUMP_LABEL and DEBUG_SET_MODULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+kxThAzwytKTv-033-jY5hTxT80PNiXp144mE=eay99Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:21:29 -0500
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Paolo Pisati <p.pisati@...il.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: arm: JUMP_LABEL and DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX should be mutually exclusive?

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 08:34:17AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Paolo Pisati <p.pisati@...il.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > i keep hitting this with BRIDGE=m, JUMP_LABEL=y and DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX=y:
>>
>> I think my RO/NX patch series solves this. I sent a pull request, but
>> I haven't seen any movement on it. :(
>
> Sorry Kees.
>
> However, even if I had looked at it, I would /not/ have been able to
> pull it.  It does the absolutely fatal thing for any pull request:
>
> The following changes since commit cc31d8f887953e9824c4d9333b15c335ee7d1b65:
>
>   Merge branches 'fiq' (early part), 'fixes' and 'misc' into for-next (2014-09-2+6 14:40:19 +0100)
>
> That commit is on my "for-next" branch.  The clue is in the name. :)
> Just like trying to base commits onto the linux-next tree, trying to
> base commits on an aggregate branch intended for linux-next usage
> doesn't work for all the same reasons.

Ah! My mistake; I was trying to figure out which branch would be best
for you to pull from. What do you prefer I use as the base for the
pull request?

Thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/