linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 10/10] uprobes: Remove "weak" from function declarations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAErSpo4upmuUW5u6XdmYXbfcf7HVcxdt_8=9+9MF0_icff_HLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:42:30 -0600
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@...aro.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	"David A. Long" <dave.long@...aro.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 10/10] uprobes: Remove "weak" from function declarations

[+cc Victor, Oleg, David, Srikar, Ananth, Russell, linux-arm-kernel,
Ben, Paul, Michael, linuxppc-dev.  arm and powerpc define some of
these functions and are at risk for this issue.]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
> For the following interfaces:
>
>   set_swbp()
>   set_orig_insn()
>   is_swbp_insn()
>   is_trap_insn()
>   uprobe_get_swbp_addr()
>   arch_uprobe_ignore()
>   arch_uprobe_copy_ixol()
>
> kernel/events/uprobes.c provides default definitions explicitly marked
> "weak".  Some architectures provide their own definitions intended to
> override the defaults, but the "weak" attribute on the declarations applied
> to the arch definitions as well, so the linker chose one based on link
> order (see 10629d711ed7 ("PCI: Remove __weak annotation from
> pcibios_get_phb_of_node decl")).
>
> Remove the "weak" attribute from the declarations so we always prefer a
> non-weak definition over the weak one, independent of link order.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> CC: Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@...aro.org>
> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> CC: David A. Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
> CC: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> CC: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/uprobes.h |   14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
> index 4f844c6b03ee..60beb5dc7977 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
> @@ -98,11 +98,11 @@ struct uprobes_state {
>         struct xol_area         *xol_area;
>  };
>
> -extern int __weak set_swbp(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr);
> -extern int __weak set_orig_insn(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr);
> -extern bool __weak is_swbp_insn(uprobe_opcode_t *insn);
> -extern bool __weak is_trap_insn(uprobe_opcode_t *insn);
> -extern unsigned long __weak uprobe_get_swbp_addr(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +extern int set_swbp(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr);
> +extern int set_orig_insn(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr);
> +extern bool is_swbp_insn(uprobe_opcode_t *insn);
> +extern bool is_trap_insn(uprobe_opcode_t *insn);
> +extern unsigned long uprobe_get_swbp_addr(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  extern unsigned long uprobe_get_trap_addr(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  extern int uprobe_write_opcode(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr, uprobe_opcode_t);
>  extern int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
> @@ -128,8 +128,8 @@ extern bool arch_uprobe_xol_was_trapped(struct task_struct *tsk);
>  extern int  arch_uprobe_exception_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long val, void *data);
>  extern void arch_uprobe_abort_xol(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
>  extern unsigned long arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(unsigned long trampoline_vaddr, struct pt_regs *regs);
> -extern bool __weak arch_uprobe_ignore(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
> -extern void __weak arch_uprobe_copy_ixol(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr,
> +extern bool arch_uprobe_ignore(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
> +extern void arch_uprobe_copy_ixol(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr,
>                                          void *src, unsigned long len);
>  #else /* !CONFIG_UPROBES */
>  struct uprobes_state {
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/