[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.11.1410161021130.5119@adalberg.ut.ee>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:22:56 +0300 (EEST)
From: Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux.com,
penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unaligned accesses in SLAB etc.
> Do you happen to have both gcc-4.9 and a previously working compiler
> on these systems? If you do, we can build a kernel with gcc-4.9 and
> then selectively compile certain failes with the older working
> compiler to narrow down what compiles into something non-working with
> gcc-4.9
Yes, I kept gcc-4.6 to help resolving it.
[...]
> Hopefully, this should be a simply matter of doing a complete build
> with gcc-4.9, then removing the object file we want to selectively
> build with the older compiler and then going:
>
> make CC="gcc-4.6" arch/sparc/mm/init_64.o
>
> then relinking with plain 'make'.
>
> If the build system rebuilds the object file on you when you try
> to relink the final kernel image, we'll have to do some of this
> by hand to make the test.
Unfortunately it starts a full rebuild with plain make after compiling
some files with gcc-4.6 - detects CC change?
--
Meelis Roos (mroos@...ux.ee)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists