[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141016030410.GA12760@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:04:10 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] x86: Make Atom PMC driver configurable.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:00:35AM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/10/16 10:18, Dave Jones wrote:
> > The Atom PMC driver is always built-in, regardless of whether
> > the kernel being built is going to be run on an Atom (or even Intel) CPU.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
> > Cc: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> > Cc: aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > index f2327e88e07c..b4dfd96aeea8 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -2485,7 +2485,8 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP
> > depends on STA2X11
> >
> > config PMC_ATOM
> > - def_bool y
> > + tristate "Intel Atom SOC power management controller driver"
>
> PMC driver provides core function like reboot, better to change to
> bool, or did you see a scenario it can be as a module?
All the MODULE_* stuff in arch/x86/kernel/pmc_atom.c threw me off.
It could also use a help text. I suspect you might be in a better
position than me to write one though.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists