linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: fix incorrect header string

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <543F39A9.3030308@huawei.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:21:13 +0800
From:	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<zhangzhiqiang.zhang@...wei.com>, <peifeiyue@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: fix incorrect header string

On 2014/10/15 23:13, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:28:53AM +0800, Wang Nan escreveu:
>> Commit fbe96f29 (perf tools: Make perf.data more self-descriptive)
>> read '/proc/cpuinfo' to form cpu descriptor. For ARM, it finds
>> 'Processor' field. It is correct when the patch merged, but due to
>> commit b4b8f770 (ARM: kernel: update cpuinfo to print all online CPUs
>> features), the corresponding information becomes 'model name' field.
>>
>> This patch simply corrects it.
> 
> It doesn't :-)
> 
> It makes it work with kernels >= b4b8f770, and fail with older kernels.
> 
> We need to somehow figure out where the right information is regardless
> of the kernel.
> 
> - Arnaldo
>  

However it is a real problem. Look at output on arm platform at the
bottom of this mail, especially  "cpudesc", "total memory" and "cmdline" field.

By further debugging I found that the real problem resides in return value checking
when write header error. Please see my other patches:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/15/612
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/15/611

I think at least one of them is required.

Thanks.

>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>  tools/perf/perf-sys.h | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/perf-sys.h b/tools/perf/perf-sys.h
>> index 937e432..4293970 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/perf-sys.h
>> +++ b/tools/perf/perf-sys.h
>> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
>>  #define mb()		((void(*)(void))0xffff0fa0)()
>>  #define wmb()		((void(*)(void))0xffff0fa0)()
>>  #define rmb()		((void(*)(void))0xffff0fa0)()
>> -#define CPUINFO_PROC	"Processor"
>> +#define CPUINFO_PROC	"model name"
>>  #endif
>>  
>>  #ifdef __aarch64__
>> -- 
>> 1.8.4



bash-4.2# perf record ls
...
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.001 MB perf.data (~36 samples) ]
bash-4.2# perf report --stdio --header
Error:
The perf.data file has no samples!
# ========
# captured on: Fri Sep 12 10:09:10 2014
# hostname : arma15el
# os release : 3.17.0+
# perf version : 3.10.53
# arch : armv7l
# nrcpus online : 4
# nrcpus avail : 1
# cpudesc : (null)
# total memory : 0 kB
# cmdline :
# event : name = cycles, type = 0, config = 0x0, config1 = 0x0, config2 = 0x0, excl_usr = 0, excl_kern = 0, excl_host = 0, excl_guest = 1, precise_ip = 0
# pmu mappings: not available
# ========
#



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/