lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1413468427-31049-3-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:07:02 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] perf tools: Fix report -F in_tx for data without branch info

The branch field sorting code assumes hist_entry::branch_info
is allocated, which is wrong and following perf session ends
up with report segfault.

  $ perf record ls
  $ perf report -F in_tx
  perf: Segmentation fault

Checking that hist_entry::branch_info is valid and display
"N/A" string in snprint callback if it's not.

Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/sort.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.c b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
index 82241fe54e4b..9bcdb57076b8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/sort.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
@@ -1021,6 +1021,9 @@ struct sort_entry sort_abort = {
 static int64_t
 sort__in_tx_cmp(struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry *right)
 {
+	if (!left->branch_info || !right->branch_info)
+		return cmp_null(left->branch_info, right->branch_info);
+
 	return left->branch_info->flags.in_tx !=
 		right->branch_info->flags.in_tx;
 }
@@ -1028,10 +1031,14 @@ sort__in_tx_cmp(struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry *right)
 static int hist_entry__in_tx_snprintf(struct hist_entry *he, char *bf,
 				    size_t size, unsigned int width)
 {
-	static const char *out = ".";
+	static const char *out = "N/A";
 
-	if (he->branch_info->flags.in_tx)
-		out = "T";
+	if (he->branch_info) {
+		if (he->branch_info->flags.in_tx)
+			out = "T";
+		else
+			out = ".";
+	}
 
 	return repsep_snprintf(bf, size, "%-*s", width, out);
 }
-- 
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ