linux-kernel - [PATCH -next 03/10] tty: Remove tsk parameter from proc_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1413485990-16855-4-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:59:43 -0400
From:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next 03/10] tty: Remove tsk parameter from proc_set_tty()

Only the current task itself can set its controlling tty (other
than before the task has been forked). Equivalent to existing usage.

Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
---
 drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
index 012647b..272d977 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ void proc_clear_tty(struct task_struct *p)
 
 /* Called under the sighand lock */
 
-static void __proc_set_tty(struct task_struct *tsk, struct tty_struct *tty)
+static void __proc_set_tty(struct tty_struct *tty)
 {
 	if (tty) {
 		unsigned long flags;
@@ -512,24 +512,24 @@ static void __proc_set_tty(struct task_struct *tsk, struct tty_struct *tty)
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->ctrl_lock, flags);
 		put_pid(tty->session);
 		put_pid(tty->pgrp);
-		tty->pgrp = get_pid(task_pgrp(tsk));
+		tty->pgrp = get_pid(task_pgrp(current));
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->ctrl_lock, flags);
-		tty->session = get_pid(task_session(tsk));
-		if (tsk->signal->tty) {
+		tty->session = get_pid(task_session(current));
+		if (current->signal->tty) {
 			printk(KERN_DEBUG "tty not NULL!!\n");
-			tty_kref_put(tsk->signal->tty);
+			tty_kref_put(current->signal->tty);
 		}
 	}
-	put_pid(tsk->signal->tty_old_pgrp);
-	tsk->signal->tty = tty_kref_get(tty);
-	tsk->signal->tty_old_pgrp = NULL;
+	put_pid(current->signal->tty_old_pgrp);
+	current->signal->tty = tty_kref_get(tty);
+	current->signal->tty_old_pgrp = NULL;
 }
 
-static void proc_set_tty(struct task_struct *tsk, struct tty_struct *tty)
+static void proc_set_tty(struct tty_struct *tty)
 {
-	spin_lock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
-	__proc_set_tty(tsk, tty);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+	__proc_set_tty(tty);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 }
 
 struct tty_struct *get_current_tty(void)
@@ -2164,7 +2164,7 @@ retry_open:
 	    current->signal->leader &&
 	    !current->signal->tty &&
 	    tty->session == NULL)
-		__proc_set_tty(current, tty);
+		__proc_set_tty(tty);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 	tty_unlock(tty);
 	mutex_unlock(&tty_mutex);
@@ -2489,7 +2489,7 @@ static int tiocsctty(struct tty_struct *tty, int arg)
 			goto unlock;
 		}
 	}
-	proc_set_tty(current, tty);
+	proc_set_tty(tty);
 unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&tty_mutex);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.1.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/