[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141016201620.GA25225@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:16:20 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/kmod: fix use-after-free of the sub_info
structure
On 10/16, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> OK... I am wondering if __call_usermodehelper() still needs CLONE_VFORK
> with this patch.
Yes, looks like it doesn't, but this needs another patch.
> > @@ -588,7 +580,7 @@ int call_usermodehelper_exec(struct subprocess_info *sub_info, int wait)
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - sub_info->complete = &done;
> > + sub_info->complete = (wait == UMH_NO_WAIT) ? NULL : &done;
>
> This probably needs a comment, and the comment in umh_complete() should
> be updated,
>
> - we own sub_info, the UMH_KILLABLE caller has gone away.
> + we own sub_info, the UMH_KILLABLE caller has gone away
> + or the caller used UMH_NO_WAIT.
>
> The patch looks correct at first glance. I'll try to re-read it later
> once again.
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists