[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141016211136.GA27468@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 23:11:36 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + freezer-check-oom-kill-while-being-frozen.patch added to -mm
tree
On 10/16, Cong Wang wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> >> Fix the issue by checking for TIF_MEMDIE thread flag and get away from the
> >> fridge if it is set. oom_scan_process_thread doesn't have to check for
> >> the frozen task anymore because do_send_sig_info will wake up the thread
> >> and TIF_MEMDIE is already set by that time.
> >
> > I must have missed something... but __refrigerator() sleeps in
> > TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE and do_send_sig_info() won't wake it up?
> >
>
> This is exactly what we are trying to fix. Make sure you read the patch
> as well before reply?
I did read the patch, but I can't understand it. I am sorry about that,
and I am asking for your help.
I agree that oom_scan_process_thread()->__thaw_task() doesn't really
help.
But also I can't understand why this patch helps. The changelog says:
do_send_sig_info will wake up the thread
why?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists