[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141016212415.GA27469@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:24:15 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: atull@...nsource.altera.com
Cc: jdelvare@...e.de, lm-sensors@...sensors.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
galak@...eaurora.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, delicious.quinoa@...il.com,
dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com, yvanderv@...nsource.altera.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] pmbus: ltc2978: add regulator support
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 01:55:06PM -0500, atull@...nsource.altera.com wrote:
> From: Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
>
> Each output has individual on/off control.
>
> New in v6:
> * Much cleanup of the bindings document
> * s/vout_en/vout/g
>
> Hopefully this is getting closer. We will still have the potential problem of
> repeated node names on boards on boards that have many regulators of the same
> kind. If this can be handled in the regulator layer, that might be great.
> If we handle it here, whatever we come up with will have to keep the same
> name over reboots and be predictable enough to serve as regulator node names
> in the DT. I'm open for suggestions here.
>
> This patchset now uses "regulator: of: Provide simplified DT parsing method"
> which are in the next-20141014 tag of linux-next.
>
Hi Alan,
Since the problems we have seen are in the regulator core code and not
in your patches, I added the series to -next. I fixed up the 'compatible'
example in the devicetree description, so there is no need to resubmit
the patches.
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists