linux-kernel - Re: + freezer-check-oom-kill-while-being-frozen.patch added to -mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:52:48 -0700
From:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + freezer-check-oom-kill-while-being-frozen.patch added to -mm tree

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> If a task B is already frozen, it sleeps in D state.
>
> If OOM selects B as a victim after that, it won't be woken by
> SIGKILL, thus it obviously can't call should_thaw_current() and
> notice TIF_MEMDIE.

I see your point now, it would be more clear if you can just quote
the patch instead of changelog.

So are you saying the loop in __refrigerator() is useless? Since
it will always stay in asleep after schedule()?

>
> Btw, I also do not understand the cgroup_freezing() check in
> should_thaw_current(), but this is another story.
>

I hate to repeat the previous discussion. Maybe you can just follow
the link I gave to you? :)

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/