linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/4] (CMA_AGGRESSIVE) Add new function shrink_all_memory_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1413538084-15743-1-git-send-email-zhuhui@xiaomi.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:28:04 +0800
From:	Hui Zhu <zhuhui@...omi.com>
To:	<rjw@...ysocki.net>, <len.brown@...el.com>, <pavel@....cz>,
	<m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<mina86@...a86.com>, <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	<iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, <hannes@...xchg.org>, <riel@...hat.com>,
	<mgorman@...e.de>, <minchan@...nel.org>, <nasa4836@...il.com>,
	<ddstreet@...e.org>, <hughd@...gle.com>, <mingo@...nel.org>,
	<rientjes@...gle.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
	<keescook@...omium.org>, <atomlin@...hat.com>, <raistlin@...ux.it>,
	<axboe@...com>, <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	<k.khlebnikov@...sung.com>, <msalter@...hat.com>, <deller@....de>,
	<tangchen@...fujitsu.com>, <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
	<akinobu.mita@...il.com>, <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
	<vbabka@...e.cz>, <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	<vdavydov@...allels.com>, <suleiman@...gle.com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@...ck.org>, Hui Zhu <zhuhui@...omi.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] (CMA_AGGRESSIVE) Add new function shrink_all_memory_for_cma

Update this patch according to the comments from Rafael.

Function shrink_all_memory_for_cma try to free `nr_to_reclaim' of memory.
CMA aggressive shrink function will call this functon to free `nr_to_reclaim' of
memory.

Signed-off-by: Hui Zhu <zhuhui@...omi.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index dcb4707..658dc8d 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -3404,6 +3404,28 @@ void wakeup_kswapd(struct zone *zone, int order, enum zone_type classzone_idx)
 	wake_up_interruptible(&pgdat->kswapd_wait);
 }
 
+#if defined CONFIG_HIBERNATION || defined CONFIG_CMA_AGGRESSIVE
+static unsigned long __shrink_all_memory(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+	struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
+	struct zonelist *zonelist = node_zonelist(numa_node_id(), sc->gfp_mask);
+	struct task_struct *p = current;
+	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
+
+	p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
+	lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(sc->gfp_mask);
+	reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
+	p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
+
+	nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, sc);
+
+	p->reclaim_state = NULL;
+	lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
+	p->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
+
+	return nr_reclaimed;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
 /*
  * Try to free `nr_to_reclaim' of memory, system-wide, and return the number of
@@ -3415,7 +3437,6 @@ void wakeup_kswapd(struct zone *zone, int order, enum zone_type classzone_idx)
  */
 unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_to_reclaim)
 {
-	struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
 	struct scan_control sc = {
 		.nr_to_reclaim = nr_to_reclaim,
 		.gfp_mask = GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE,
@@ -3425,24 +3446,31 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_to_reclaim)
 		.may_swap = 1,
 		.hibernation_mode = 1,
 	};
-	struct zonelist *zonelist = node_zonelist(numa_node_id(), sc.gfp_mask);
-	struct task_struct *p = current;
-	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
-
-	p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
-	lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(sc.gfp_mask);
-	reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
-	p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
 
-	nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
+	return __shrink_all_memory(&sc);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_HIBERNATION */
 
-	p->reclaim_state = NULL;
-	lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
-	p->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
+#ifdef CONFIG_CMA_AGGRESSIVE
+/*
+ * Try to free `nr_to_reclaim' of memory, system-wide, for CMA aggressive
+ * shrink function.
+ */
+void shrink_all_memory_for_cma(unsigned long nr_to_reclaim)
+{
+	struct scan_control sc = {
+		.nr_to_reclaim = nr_to_reclaim,
+		.gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE | __GFP_HIGHMEM,
+		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
+		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
+		.may_unmap = 1,
+		.may_swap = 1,
+	};
 
-	return nr_reclaimed;
+	__shrink_all_memory(&sc);
 }
-#endif /* CONFIG_HIBERNATION */
+#endif /* CONFIG_CMA_AGGRESSIVE */
+#endif /* CONFIG_HIBERNATION || CONFIG_CMA_AGGRESSIVE */
 
 /* It's optimal to keep kswapds on the same CPUs as their memory, but
    not required for correctness.  So if the last cpu in a node goes
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/