[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1410171015540.15673@vincent-weaver-1.umelst.maine.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:19:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: perf: 3.17 another perf_fuzzer lockup
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > It looks like the
> > else if (task->perf_event_ctxp[ctxn])
> > err = -EAGAIN;
>
> It is indeed stuck there, waiting for task->perf_event_ctxp[1] to get
> set to zero, which never happens.
>
OK, so with some more printk()s, it looks like somehow the parent thread
is trying to open a software event on itself.
task->perf_event_ctxp[1]
has a valid pointer, but the ctx it points to has a ctx->lock of 0.
So perf_lock_task_context() always returns NULL.
So in find_get_context()
we get stuck in an infinite retry loop, waiting forever for
either ctx->lock to go positive or for task->perf_event_ctxp[1]
to go NULL, neither of which is going to happen.
Now to find out why this could happen. Probably something to do with
crazy RCU magic :(
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists