[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141017160737.GH8076@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:07:37 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + freezer-check-oom-kill-while-being-frozen.patch added to -mm
tree
On Fri 17-10-14 17:24:29, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 10/16, Cong Wang wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > On 10/16, Cong Wang wrote:
> > >>
> > >> it will always stay in asleep after schedule()?
> > >
> > > Not always. But it will stay asleep in this particular case.
> >
> > Hmm, so we still need to wake it up in oom killer:
> >
> > if (test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_MEMDIE)) {
> > if (unlikely(frozen(task)))
> > wake_up_state(task, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> >
> > I will update the patch if Michal doesn't.
>
> I think it would be better to simply keep that __thaw_task() in
> oom_scan_process_thread().
yeah, v2 of the patch (I guess you were on CC) does exactly this.
Thanks!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists