linux-kernel - Re: Touch processing on host CPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:17:56 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Nick Dyer <nick.dyer@...ev.co.uk>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Touch processing on host CPU

Hi Nick,

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:42:10AM +0100, Nick Dyer wrote:
> Hi-
> 
> I'm trying to find out which subsystem maintainer I should be talking to -
> apologies if I'm addressing the wrong people.
> 
> There is a model for doing touch processing where the touch controller
> becomes a much simpler device which sends out raw acquisitions (over SPI 
> at up to 1Mbps + protocol overheads). All touch processing is then done in
> user space by the host CPU. An example of this is NVIDIA DirectTouch - see:
> http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2012/02/24/industry-adopts-nvidia-directtouch/
> 
> In the spirit of "upstream first", I'm trying to figure out how to get a
> driver accepted. Obviously it's not an input device in the normal sense. Is
> it acceptable just to send the raw touch data out via a char device? Is
> there another subsystem which is a good match (eg IIO)? Does the protocol
> (there is ancillary/control data as well) need to be documented?

I'd really think *long* and *hard* about this. Even if you will have the
touch process open source you have 2 options: route it back into the
kernel through uinput, thus adding latency (which might be OK, need to
measure and decide), or go back about 10 years where we had
device-specific drivers in XFree86 and re-create them again, and also do
the same for Wayland, Chrome, Android, etc.

If you will have touch processing in a binary blob, you'll also be going
to ages "Works with Ubuntu 12.04 on x86_32!" (and nothing else), or
"Android 5.1.2 on Tegra Blah (build 78912KT)" (and nothing else).

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/