| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:11:33 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/3] virtio_net: enable tx interrupt
On 10/15/2014 10:32 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On newer hosts that support delayed tx interrupts,
> we probably don't have much to gain from orphaning
> packets early.
>
> Based on patch by Jason Wang.
>
> Note: this might degrade performance for
> hosts without event idx support.
> Should be addressed by the next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 13d0a8b..a9bf178 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ struct send_queue {
>
> /* Name of the send queue: output.$index */
> char name[40];
> +
> + struct napi_struct napi;
> };
>
> /* Internal representation of a receive virtqueue */
> @@ -217,15 +219,37 @@ static struct page *get_a_page(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> return p;
> }
>
> +static unsigned int free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq, int budget)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + unsigned int len;
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
> + struct virtnet_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(vi->stats);
> + unsigned int packets = 0;
> +
> + while (packets < budget &&
> + (skb = virtqueue_get_buf(sq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> + pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> +
> + u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->tx_syncp);
> + stats->tx_bytes += skb->len;
> + stats->tx_packets++;
> + u64_stats_update_end(&stats->tx_syncp);
> +
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> + packets++;
> + }
> +
> + return packets;
> +}
> +
> static void skb_xmit_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
> {
> struct virtnet_info *vi = vq->vdev->priv;
> + struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[vq2txq(vq)];
>
> - /* Suppress further interrupts. */
> - virtqueue_disable_cb(vq);
> -
> - /* We were probably waiting for more output buffers. */
> - netif_wake_subqueue(vi->dev, vq2txq(vq));
> + if (napi_schedule_prep(&sq->napi))
> + __napi_schedule(&sq->napi);
> }
>
> static unsigned int mergeable_ctx_to_buf_truesize(unsigned long mrg_ctx)
> @@ -774,6 +798,37 @@ again:
> return received;
> }
>
> +static int virtnet_poll_tx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> +{
> + struct send_queue *sq =
> + container_of(napi, struct send_queue, napi);
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
> + struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, vq2txq(sq->vq));
> + unsigned int sent = 0;
> + bool enable_done;
> +
> +again:
> + __netif_tx_lock(txq, smp_processor_id());
> + virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
> + sent += free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, budget - sent);
> +
> + if (sent < budget) {
> + enable_done = virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq);
> + napi_complete(napi);
> + __netif_tx_unlock(txq);
> + if (unlikely(enable_done) && napi_schedule_prep(napi)) {
I think you mean unlikely(!enable_done) here?
> + virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
> + __napi_schedule(napi);
> + goto again;
> + }
> + } else {
> + __netif_tx_unlock(txq);
> + }
> +
> + netif_wake_subqueue(vi->dev, vq2txq(sq->vq));
> + return sent;
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
> /* must be called with local_bh_disable()d */
> static int virtnet_busy_poll(struct napi_struct *napi)
> @@ -822,30 +877,12 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
> if (!try_fill_recv(&vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
> schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[i]);
> + napi_enable(&vi->sq[i].napi);
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq)
> -{
> - struct sk_buff *skb;
> - unsigned int len;
> - struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
> - struct virtnet_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(vi->stats);
> -
> - while ((skb = virtqueue_get_buf(sq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> - pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> -
> - u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->tx_syncp);
> - stats->tx_bytes += skb->len;
> - stats->tx_packets++;
> - u64_stats_update_end(&stats->tx_syncp);
> -
> - dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> - }
> -}
> -
> static int xmit_skb(struct send_queue *sq, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct skb_vnet_hdr *hdr;
> @@ -911,7 +948,9 @@ static int xmit_skb(struct send_queue *sq, struct sk_buff *skb)
> sg_set_buf(sq->sg, hdr, hdr_len);
> num_sg = skb_to_sgvec(skb, sq->sg + 1, 0, skb->len) + 1;
> }
> - return virtqueue_add_outbuf(sq->vq, sq->sg, num_sg, skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +
> + return virtqueue_add_outbuf(sq->vq, sq->sg, num_sg, skb,
> + GFP_ATOMIC);
> }
>
> static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> @@ -919,12 +958,16 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> int qnum = skb_get_queue_mapping(skb);
> struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[qnum];
> - int err;
> + int err, qsize = virtqueue_get_vring_size(sq->vq);
> struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, qnum);
> bool kick = !skb->xmit_more;
> + bool stopped;
> +
> + virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
>
> - /* Free up any pending old buffers before queueing new ones. */
> - free_old_xmit_skbs(sq);
> + /* We are going to push one skb.
> + * Try to pop one off to free space for it. */
> + free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, 1);
Looks like qsize instead of 1 is better? The more skbs freed in
ndo_start_xmit() the less chance tx napi will be scheduled.
>
> /* Try to transmit */
> err = xmit_skb(sq, skb);
> @@ -940,27 +983,25 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> }
>
> - /* Don't wait up for transmitted skbs to be freed. */
> - skb_orphan(skb);
> - nf_reset(skb);
> -
> /* Apparently nice girls don't return TX_BUSY; stop the queue
> * before it gets out of hand. Naturally, this wastes entries. */
> if (sq->vq->num_free < 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> netif_stop_subqueue(dev, qnum);
> - if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq))) {
> - /* More just got used, free them then recheck. */
> - free_old_xmit_skbs(sq);
> - if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> - netif_start_subqueue(dev, qnum);
> - virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
> - }
> - }
> + stopped = true;
> + } else {
> + stopped = false;
> }
>
> if (kick || netif_xmit_stopped(txq))
> virtqueue_kick(sq->vq);
Looks like we'd better move this in the end in case the queue could be
restarted by following lines?
>
> + if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq))) {
> + /* More just got used, free them then recheck. */
> + free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, qsize);
> + if (stopped && sq->vq->num_free >= 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
> + netif_start_subqueue(dev, qnum);
Why drop virtqueue_disable_cb() here?
> + }
> +
> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> }
>
> @@ -1137,8 +1178,10 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev)
> /* Make sure refill_work doesn't re-enable napi! */
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> napi_disable(&vi->rq[i].napi);
> + napi_disable(&vi->sq[i].napi);
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1457,8 +1500,10 @@ static void virtnet_free_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> {
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> netif_napi_del(&vi->rq[i].napi);
> + netif_napi_del(&vi->sq[i].napi);
> + }
>
> kfree(vi->rq);
> kfree(vi->sq);
> @@ -1612,6 +1657,8 @@ static int virtnet_alloc_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> netif_napi_add(vi->dev, &vi->rq[i].napi, virtnet_poll,
> napi_weight);
> napi_hash_add(&vi->rq[i].napi);
> + netif_napi_add(vi->dev, &vi->sq[i].napi, virtnet_poll_tx,
> + napi_weight);
>
> sg_init_table(vi->rq[i].sg, ARRAY_SIZE(vi->rq[i].sg));
> ewma_init(&vi->rq[i].mrg_avg_pkt_len, 1, RECEIVE_AVG_WEIGHT);
> @@ -1916,8 +1963,10 @@ static int virtnet_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> if (netif_running(vi->dev)) {
> for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> napi_disable(&vi->rq[i].napi);
> + napi_disable(&vi->sq[i].napi);
> napi_hash_del(&vi->rq[i].napi);
> netif_napi_del(&vi->rq[i].napi);
> + netif_napi_del(&vi->sq[i].napi);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1942,8 +1991,10 @@ static int virtnet_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> if (!try_fill_recv(&vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
> schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[i]);
> + napi_enable(&vi->sq[i].napi);
> + }
> }
>
> netif_device_attach(vi->dev);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists