[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <670899746.71006536.1413569216696.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:06:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] watchdog: parameters to control hard and soft
lockup detector individually
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Zickus" <dzickus@...hat.com>
> To: "Ulrich Obergfell" <uobergfe@...hat.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:56:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] watchdog: parameters to control hard and soft lockup detector individually
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:32:41PM +0200, Ulrich Obergfell wrote:
>> This post follows up to https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/11/329.
>> During the discussion of that patch, Ingo Molnar commented in
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/18/577.
>>
>> "The softlockup and hardlockup detection control variables
>> should be in separate flags, inside and outside the kernel -
>> they (should) not relate to each other."
>>
>> Please refer to [PATCH 1/1] for a description of the proposed
>> changes of the 'user interface' in /proc/sys/kernel and kernel
>> command line parameters.
>
> Hi Uli,
>
> Andrew just posted some of your other patches upstream for v3.18-rc1.
> Let's try to rebase these changes on top of those and see what it looks
> like.
>
> Cheers,
> Don
Don,
I rebased the changes and posted a 'version 2' series in
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/17/340
Regards,
Uli
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists