linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: Resolve some missing-field-initializers warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <C69957AC-DB35-467C-85B1-091B740C74C9@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:44:36 +0000
From:	"Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	"JBottomley@...allels.com" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Resolve some missing-field-initializers warnings

The warning appears in W=2 builds. I had another way to silence it by using diagnostic control macros, but those macros were not accepted. Using a single designated initialization also silences it.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 17, 2014, at 8:26 AM, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 06:38:53AM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
>> From: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
>> 
>> Resolve some missing-field-initializers warnings by using
>> designated initialization.
> 
> What tool is warning about these?  This construct is perfectly valid C.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/