linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Enable Quark X1000 support in gpio-sch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:02:47 +0900
From:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To:	"Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun" <rebecca.swee.fun.chang@...el.com>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	"Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
	GPIO Subsystem Mailing List <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Enable Quark X1000 support in gpio-sch

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun
<rebecca.swee.fun.chang@...el.com> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alexandre Courbot [mailto:gnurou@...il.com]
>> Sent: 09 October, 2014 2:29 PM
>> To: Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun
>> Cc: Linus Walleij; Westerberg, Mika; GPIO Subsystem Mailing List; Linux Kernel
>> Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Enable Quark X1000 support in gpio-sch
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Chang Rebecca Swee Fun
>> <rebecca.swee.fun.chang@...el.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This is a revised version for gpio-sch.
>> >
>> > Change log for V2:
>> > Patch 1:
>> > - Move sch_gpio_get() and sch_gpio_set() to avoid forward declaration.
>> > - Changed sch_gpio_enable()/sch_gpio_disable() to sch_gpio_register_set()/
>> >   sch_gpio_register_clear().
>> >
>> > Patch 3:
>> > - Changed all sch_gpio_enable()/sch_gpio_disable() to
>> sch_gpio_register_set()/
>> >   sch_gpio_register_clear().
>> >
>> > Version 1:
>> > This patch series is about enabling legacy GPIO support for Quark X1000.
>> > The patches were developed on top of Mika Westerberg's commit on
>> > consolidating core and resume banks. Please refer to the link below
>> > for more information about his commit.
>> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/17/13
>>
>> Sorry for the late review. I tried to apply the patch you mentioned above before
>> your series, and even Mika's patch won't apply on Linus'
>> devel branch or today's -next. This make it difficult to make a good review.
>> Could you rebase and resend this series once all its dependencies have been
>> merge by Linus W. ?
>
> Hi, I've noticed that Mika had sent a V2series on his work. Referring to his submission in: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/16/213, this patch was able to patch on today's kernel tree. The patches on my series are able to patch in too. Do I need to resend since there is no changes on my side?

I got your v3 applied on top of Linus' devel tree and Mika's patch
without any issue. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/