[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141018.142335.1935310766779155342.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 14:23:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mroos@...ux.ee
Cc: iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux.com,
penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unaligned accesses in SLAB etc.
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:59:07 -0400 (EDT)
> I don't want to define the array size of the fpregs save area
> explicitly and thereby placing an artificial limit there.
Nevermind, it seems we have a hard limit of 7 FPU save areas anyways.
Meelis, please try this patch:
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
index f85dc85..cc6275c 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
@@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ struct thread_info {
struct pt_regs *kern_una_regs;
unsigned int kern_una_insn;
- unsigned long fpregs[0] __attribute__ ((aligned(64)));
+ unsigned long fpregs[(7 * 256) / sizeof(unsigned long)]
+ __attribute__ ((aligned(64)));
};
#endif /* !(__ASSEMBLY__) */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists