linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] fuse: handle release synchronously (v4)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141018184528.GG7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 18 Oct 2014 19:45:28 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...allels.com>,
	Anand Avati <avati@...ster.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michael j Theall <mtheall@...ibm.com>,
	fuse-devel <fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] fuse: handle release synchronously (v4)

On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 07:24:54PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 08:01:13PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> 
> > And what you don't get is that there's a deep difference between those
> > and the /proc file access case.
> > 
> > And the difference is that one is done because of an explicit action
> > by the holder of the open file.  And the other is done by some random
> > process doing non-invasive examination of the holder of the open-file.
> 
> Such as ls -l /proc/*/fd/*?  That will give you the same transient EBUSY
> from umount, if it hits the right moment...

stat -L /proc/*/fd/*, that is...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/