lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 18 Oct 2014 10:49:59 +0200
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties
 support

On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 00:50 +0200
, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
 wrote:
> On Friday, October 17, 2014 08:04:52 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > 
> > On October 17, 2014 2:01:33 PM CEST, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> > >Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > >Hving had a couple of chats with Grant and Arnd during LinuxCon EU/LPC,
> > >we
> > >now have version 5 taking all feedback into account (hopefully).
> > 
> > Awesome, that was really fast. I'm currently on my way his me in
> > the train, replying from my phone, but it looks good now. I'll have a more
> > detailed look next week but I'm definitely happy to see this go in (to next
> > and 3.19) now, any details we still find can be fixed on top.
> > 
> > > In
> > >short, if
> > >we are passed a struct fwnode_handle pointer, we can get from it to the
> > >appropriate device node pointer (either struct acpi_device or struct
> > >device_node)
> > >using container_of() after we've checked the type.  This is needed for
> > >the code
> > >that needs to access child nodes of a device in case when they don't
> > >have
> > >struct device representations (whatever the reason).  This has been
> > >suggested
> > >by Grant and pretty much everyone involved agrees that it's better that
> > >the
> > >alternatives presented so far.
> > 
> > Yes, it's nice enough that I now take back all the objections I had for the
> > child accessory API.
> 
> Cool, thanks!
> 
> I've just refreshed the device-properties branch of the linux-pm.git tree
> and it contains the current material now (including a couple of build
> fixes reported by the autobuild robot in patches [02/12] and [09/12]).
> 
> My plan is to merge this into the linux-next branch when 3.18-rc1 is out.

Wait for my ack please, but I should be able to review it this weekend
or on Monday. I'm actually reviewing now, but I'm on a plane near the
end of the flight. As soon as I get on the ground SIGFAMILY will
interrupt me for a bit. :-)

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists