[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141019153219.GA10644@ravnborg.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 17:32:20 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mroos@...ux.ee, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unaligned accesses in SLAB etc.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 02:23:35PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:59:07 -0400 (EDT)
>
> > I don't want to define the array size of the fpregs save area
> > explicitly and thereby placing an artificial limit there.
>
> Nevermind, it seems we have a hard limit of 7 FPU save areas anyways.
>
> Meelis, please try this patch:
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
> index f85dc85..cc6275c 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
> @@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ struct thread_info {
> struct pt_regs *kern_una_regs;
> unsigned int kern_una_insn;
>
> - unsigned long fpregs[0] __attribute__ ((aligned(64)));
> + unsigned long fpregs[(7 * 256) / sizeof(unsigned long)]
This part:
> + __attribute__ ((aligned(64)));
Could be written as __aligned(64)
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists