[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141019195553.GA11365@ravnborg.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 21:55:53 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mroos@...ux.ee, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unaligned accesses in SLAB etc.
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 01:27:37PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 17:32:20 +0200
>
> > This part:
> >
> >> + __attribute__ ((aligned(64)));
> >
> > Could be written as __aligned(64)
>
> I'll try to remember to sweep this up in sparc-next, thanks Sam.
>
> We probably use this long-hand form in a lot of other places in
> the sparc code too, so I'll try to do a full sweep.
Another related one would be a full sweep of "__asm__ __volatile__"
to the shorter version "asm volatile".
The latter is used in a few places in sparc already - so toolchain supports it.
I got hits in:
include/asm/irqflags_32.h: asm volatile("rd %%psr, %0" : "=r" (flags));
include/asm/processor_64.h:#define cpu_relax() asm volatile("\n99:\n\t" \
kernel/kprobes.c: asm volatile(".global kretprobe_trampoline\n"
But this would touch 93 files. Thats too much crunch :-(
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists