linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/27] Fix common bug in most nand drivers not showing a device in sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 19 Oct 2014 23:24:43 +0200
From:	Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>
To:	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] Fix common bug in most nand drivers not showing a
 device in sysfs

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 05:54:03PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
> I assume the result will be just 21 one-line-patches anyway, missing
> the chance to avoid similiar silly patch series in the future by
> creating a common function (which even reduces code size over all).

That's to be expected, yes. A single patch may even be defensible. I
share your concern that it's easier to get it wrong than it is to get it
right, though.

> So, if you like, just add my Signed-off-by too, there isn't really much
> one could do wrong. ;)

Sure.

Frans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/