lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2014 06:14:12 +0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties
 support

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:49:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, October 17, 2014 05:40:07 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 02:01:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > > 
> > > Hving had a couple of chats with Grant and Arnd during LinuxCon EU/LPC, we
> > > now have version 5 taking all feedback into account (hopefully).
> > > 
> > > Changes have been made to patch [02/12] and to patches [09-12/12], although
> > > in patches [10-12/12] they are fairly minor.  I have retained the Greg's
> > > ACK on patch [02/12], because it is essentially the same that have been
> > > posted aleady and ACKed by him (Greg, please let me know if I shouldn't
> > > do that) and all the ACKs on the remaining patches except for patch [09/12]
> > > which is substantially different.  Still, if reviewers think that their
> > > ACKs don't apply any more, please let me know and I'll remove them.
> > 
> > No objection from me to keep my ACK on those patches, thanks for asking.
> 
> Well, that's just fair IMO. :-)
> 
> Does [09/12] look good too in particular?

Yes, I have no objections to it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists