linux-kernel - Re: unaligned accesses in SLAB etc.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.11.1410191006430.32417@adalberg.ut.ee>
Date:	Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:07:03 +0300 (EEST)
From:	Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unaligned accesses in SLAB etc.

> From: Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:38:20 +0300 (EEST)
> 
> > arch/sparc/kernel/setup_64.c is the only culprit.
> > 
> > Attached are 2 versions of the object file as of v3.17-rc1-22-g480cadc 
> > that I tested.
> 
> Just to confirm, a gcc-4.9 compiled kernel works if just setup_64.c
> is built with gcc-4.6, is that correct?

Yes, exactly.

-- 
Meelis Roos (mroos@...ux.ee)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/