[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+H2tpH2dKFHxHUaGtr-vEqxZDtQ_MVTmQTnu5kn-zzUFyXk4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:23:38 +0800
From: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...eadtrum.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"jslaby@...e.cz" <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"m-karicheri2@...com" <m-karicheri2@...com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>,
"rrichter@...ium.com" <rrichter@...ium.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Geng Ren (任赓) <geng.ren@...eadtrum.com>,
Zhizhou Zhang (张治洲)
<zhizhou.zhang@...eadtrum.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sprdlinux <sprdlinux@...elists.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] tty/serial: Add earlycon support for Spreadtrum
serial driver
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:06 AM, One Thousand Gnomes
<gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:54:25 +0800
> Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...eadtrum.com> wrote:
>
>> Add serial driver for spreadtrum sharkl platform with earlycon
>> support at first.
>
>> +#define UART_TXD 0x0000
>> +#define UART_RXD 0x0004
>> +#define UART_STS0 0x0008
>> +#define UART_STS1 0x000C
>> +#define UART_IEN 0x0010
>> +#define UART_ICLR 0x0014
>> +#define UART_CTL0 0x0018
>> +#define UART_CTL1 0x001C
>> +#define UART_CTL2 0x0020
>> +#define UART_CLKD0 0x0024
>> +#define UART_CLKD1 0x0028
>> +#define UART_STS2 0x002C
>> +
>> +/*line status */
>> +#define UART_LSR_TX_OVER (0x1<<15)
>
> Given we use UART_ for all the 8250 defines it might be better to use
> something else - SHARK_LSR_TX_OVER etc to avoid future confusion
>
Does it matter if those macro are only used in the specific c file?
>From my point of view, private register macro could be treated as
static definitions like static variable or functions in C file.
I also noted that many people use a prefix for the other
manufacturers' macro definition in source file .
I have no intention to break the habit of kernel but just for discussion.
>> +static void serial_sprd_putc(struct uart_port *port, int c)
>> +{
>> + while (!(readl(port->membase + UART_STS0) & UART_LSR_TX_OVER))
>> + ;
>> + writeb(c, port->membase + UART_TXD);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void serial_sprd_early_write(struct console *con, const char *s,
>> + unsigned n)
>> +{
>> + struct earlycon_device *dev = con->data;
>> +
>> + uart_console_write(&dev->port, s, n, serial_sprd_putc);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __init serial_sprd_early_console_setup(
>> + struct earlycon_device *device,
>> + const char *opt)
>> +{
>> + if (!device->port.membase)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + device->con->write = serial_sprd_early_write;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> This seems fine but it would be useful to see both the earlycon and the
> main uart/console driver and how they fit together.
>
> Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists