[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1413804158.13490.6.camel@mm-sol.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:22:38 +0300
From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, svarbanov@...sol.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: inkern: Add of_xlate function to struct iio_dev
On Sat, 2014-10-18 at 13:14 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 18/10/14 12:50, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > On 10/18/2014 01:42 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > On 02/10/14 13:32, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > > > When #iio-cells is greater than '0', the driver could provide
> > > > a custom of_xlate function that reads the *args* and returns
> > > > the appropriate index in registered IIO channels array.
> > > > >
> > > > Add simple translation function, suitable for the most 1:1
> > > > mapped channels in IIO chips, and use it when driver did not
> > > > provide custom implementation.
> > > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@...sol.com>
> > > Any more comments on this? Been sat a while and the
> > > discussions seems
> > > to have died out.
> > > >
> > > As Ivan has pointed out, very similar approaches are used
> > > elsewhere (gpio for example).
> >
> > Looks good to me:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
> >
> > When we initially added the DT support to IIO I was hoping that
> > we can get away
> > with just using the simple and generic xlate function for all
> > devices. But it
> > looks as if some more complex devices need to overwrite it. We
> > should be careful
> > about adding new driver specific xlate implementations and make
> > sure that it is
> > actually needed.
> >
> > One thing we might want to consider though is instead of adding
> > the xlate
> > callback to the iio_dev struct add it to the iio_info struct
> > since it should be
> > the same for different device instances of the same driver. And
> > this is also
> > where all the other callbacks are.
> Good point - would definitely prefer that.
Thank you. Will rework it as suggested.
Regards,
Ivan
>
> J
> >
> > - Lars
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists