[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141020144223.5655dcbc.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:42:23 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/25] virtio_console: enable VQs early
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:07:50 +0100
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
> On 10/13/14 at 10:50am, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > virtio spec requires drivers to set DRIVER_OK before using VQs.
> > This is set automatically after probe returns, virtio console violated this
> > rule by adding inbufs, which causes the VQ to be used directly within
> > probe.
> >
> > To fix, call virtio_device_ready before using VQs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> > index b585b47..6ebe8f6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> > @@ -1449,6 +1449,8 @@ static int add_port(struct ports_device *portdev, u32 id)
> > spin_lock_init(&port->outvq_lock);
> > init_waitqueue_head(&port->waitqueue);
> >
> > + virtio_device_ready(portdev->vdev);
> > +
> > /* Fill the in_vq with buffers so the host can send us data. */
> > nr_added_bufs = fill_queue(port->in_vq, &port->inbuf_lock);
> > if (!nr_added_bufs) {
>
> Seems like probe and add_port() now both set VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK
I think we need to set this in the probe function instead, otherwise we
fail for multiqueue (which also wants to use the control queue early).
Completely untested patch below; I can send this with proper s-o-b if
it helps.
diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
index bfa6400..cf7a561 100644
--- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
+++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
@@ -1449,8 +1449,6 @@ static int add_port(struct ports_device *portdev, u32 id)
spin_lock_init(&port->outvq_lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&port->waitqueue);
- virtio_device_ready(portdev->vdev);
-
/* Fill the in_vq with buffers so the host can send us data. */
nr_added_bufs = fill_queue(port->in_vq, &port->inbuf_lock);
if (!nr_added_bufs) {
@@ -2026,6 +2024,8 @@ static int virtcons_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
spin_lock_init(&portdev->ports_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&portdev->ports);
+ virtio_device_ready(portdev->vdev);
+
if (multiport) {
unsigned int nr_added_bufs;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists