linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] scsi: bfa: bfa_fcs_lport.c: Cleaning up missing null-terminate by switching from strncpy to strzcpy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141020153707.GX26918@mwanda>
Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:37:07 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
Cc:	Anil Gurumurthy <anil.gurumurthy@...gic.com>,
	Sudarsana Kalluru <sudarsana.kalluru@...gic.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] scsi: bfa: bfa_fcs_lport.c:  Cleaning up missing
 null-terminate by switching from strncpy to strzcpy

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:13:10AM +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> Ensures that the string is null-terminate in connection with the
> use of strncpy, by switching from strncpy to strzcpy.
> 

I wish the changelogs were more clear that we have no reason to think
this is a real issue.

> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c
> index ff75ef8..78af89e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c
> @@ -2633,7 +2633,7 @@ bfa_fcs_fdmi_get_hbaattr(struct bfa_fcs_lport_fdmi_s *fdmi,
>  	strncpy(hba_attr->driver_version, (char *)driver_info->version,
>  		sizeof(hba_attr->driver_version));

Why do we not change this one?

>  
> -	strncpy(hba_attr->os_name, driver_info->host_os_name,
> +	strzcpy(hba_attr->os_name, driver_info->host_os_name,
>  		sizeof(hba_attr->os_name));

strlcpy() would also be totally safe here.  It's also safe for patch
patch 3 and patch 4.  Patch 5 is trickier to audit so I don't know if
strlcpy() is safe.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/