lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:45:14 -0400
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm, compaction: pass classzone_idx and alloc_flags
 to watermark checking

On 10/07/2014 11:33 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Compaction relies on zone watermark checks for decisions such as if it's worth
> to start compacting in compaction_suitable() or whether compaction should stop
> in compact_finished(). The watermark checks take classzone_idx and alloc_flags
> parameters, which are related to the memory allocation request. But from the
> context of compaction they are currently passed as 0, including the direct
> compaction which is invoked to satisfy the allocation request, and could
> therefore know the proper values.
>
> The lack of proper values can lead to mismatch between decisions taken during
> compaction and decisions related to the allocation request. Lack of proper
> classzone_idx value means that lowmem_reserve is not taken into account.
> This has manifested (during recent changes to deferred compaction) when DMA
> zone was used as fallback for preferred Normal zone. compaction_suitable()
> without proper classzone_idx would think that the watermarks are already
> satisfied, but watermark check in get_page_from_freelist() would fail. Because
> of this problem, deferring compaction has extra complexity that can be removed
> in the following patch.
>
> The issue (not confirmed in practice) with missing alloc_flags is opposite in
> nature. For allocations that include ALLOC_HIGH, ALLOC_HIGHER or ALLOC_CMA in
> alloc_flags (the last includes all MOVABLE allocations on CMA-enabled systems)
> the watermark checking in compaction with 0 passed will be stricter than in
> get_page_from_freelist(). In these cases compaction might be running for a
> longer time than is really needed.
>
> This patch fixes these problems by adding alloc_flags and classzone_idx to
> struct compact_control and related functions involved in direct compaction and
> watermark checking. Where possible, all other callers of compaction_suitable()
> pass proper values where those are known. This is currently limited to
> classzone_idx, which is sometimes known in kswapd context. However, the direct
> reclaim callers should_continue_reclaim() and compaction_ready() do not
> currently know the proper values, so the coordination between reclaim and
> compaction may still not be as accurate as it could. This can be fixed later,
> if it's shown to be an issue.
>
> The effect of this patch should be slightly better high-order allocation
> success rates and/or less compaction overhead, depending on the type of
> allocations and presence of CMA. It allows simplifying deferred compaction
> code in a followup patch.
>
> When testing with stress-highalloc, there was some slight improvement (which
> might be just due to variance) in success rates of non-THP-like allocations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>

Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists