lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:34:29 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> To: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/numa: fix unsafe get_task_struct() in task_numa_assign() Kirill, You should be as rude as you can if you send an email to lkml! You are breaking the well-known rules, and now I have to mimic your wrong behaviour. On 10/21, Kirill Tkhai wrote: > > No, I won't send. Please do this. Your idea and your patch is almost > ready. Thanks :) Come on. You have found the nontrivial problem. This is much more important than a simple fix. And if we prefer a less-trivial fix which plays with ->curr recheck, then it will be based on your idea, not mine. So please make a patch after we know what Peter thinks. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists