linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] init: Disable defaults if init= fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20141020144117.b75967da82113b1851e2596e@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:41:17 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] init: Disable defaults if init= fails

On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:34:14 -0700 Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:01:55 -0700 Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org> wrote:
> >
> >> > IOW, the no-fallback behavior is easy to implement, easy to
> >> > understand, and has extremely predictable behavior.  The fallback
> >> > behavior is more user friendly if you consider having a chance of
> >> > booting to something useful if you typo your init= option (but also a
> >> > chance of booting to something actively undesirable).
> >>
> >> Here's an alternative proposal: how about we change the default
> >> *without* a Kconfig option, see if anyone screams, and if they do, we
> >> add that code back in under a Kconfig option as in your current patch?
> >>
> >> Would that make your Kconfig senses stop tingling, Andrew? :)
> >
> > Mumble.  I suppose we can run with it as-is: at least the config option
> > is there to allow people to repair any damage easily.
> >
> > However we don't have any way of remembering to remove the config
> > option later coz someone removed feature-removal-schedule.txt, which
> > was a useful feature.
> 
> Does -mm have a next+1 section?  If so, you could queue it up now :)

Yes, I can do that.  I add little notes-to-self in the series file to
remember such things.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/