[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141020152448.c50fa1855d451f4bba0f6f92@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:24:48 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel, add bug_on_warn
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 08:00:20 -0400 Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com> wrote:
> There have been several times where I have had to rebuild a kernel to
> cause a panic when hitting a WARN() in the code in order to get a crash
> dump from a system. Sometimes this is easy to do, other times (such as
> in the case of a remote admin) it is not trivial to send new images to the
> user.
>
> A much easier method would be a switch to change the WARN() over to a
> BUG(). This makes debugging easier in that I can now test the actual
> image the WARN() was seen on and I do not have to engage in remote
> debugging.
>
> This patch adds a bug_on_warn kernel parameter, which calls BUG() in the
> warn_slowpath_common() path. The function will still print out the
> location of the warning.
>
> Successfully tested by me.
Looks nice and simple and useful. However I suspect you're exclusively
focussed on "I want a crash dump" and things haven't been fully thought
through.
- Do you have any example WARN->BUG console output at hand? I'd like
to check for missing or duplicated info.
- Did you consider permitting this to be tweaked at runtime via
/proc? Sometimes we get pesky WARNs at boot time and having runtime
alteration would permit the user to prevent those from tripping a
BUG.
- Also, perhaps bug_on_warn should be single-shot: clear itself after
it has triggered one BUG. Because once the kernel has gone
WARN->BUG, it's probably messed up and is likely to trigger more
WARNs. Also, the kernel might generate many WARNs for the same
issue.
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -553,6 +553,8 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
> bttv.pll= See Documentation/video4linux/bttv/Insmod-options
> bttv.tuner=
>
> + bug_on_warn BUG() instead of WARN()
There's no mention here that this feature is mainly aimed at generating
a crash dump. How do we tell the people who aren't reading this email
thread (ie: all of humanity except you and me ;)) that this feature
even exists? Is there crash dump documentation that we can update?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists