[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141021042108.GB11691@sucs.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:21:08 +0100
From: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...il.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: add try_rc16 blacklist flag
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:08:28PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Sitsofe" == Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...il.com> writes:
>
> Sitsofe> Microsoft Hyper-V virtual disks currently only claim SPC-2
> Sitsofe> compliance causing the kernel skip checks for features such as
> Sitsofe> thin provisioning even though the virtual disk advertises them.
>
> Last time around we identified this as a problem with Microsoft's
> interpretation of the T10 SBC spec. And they promised that they are
> going to fix that.
OK but if we were happy to wait for Microsoft to fix the problem on the
host why were the (broken and incomplete) BLIST_SKIP_VPD_PAGES patches
committed to 3.17 rather than withdrawn? What's going to be done about
those patches now?
--
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists