[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A70AC0C1B7E7FD478A6BF19705461AA01109B5@IMBER.smb.curriegrad2004.ca>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:19:31 -0700
From: "Jeff Leung" <jleung@...networks.ca>
To: "Sitsofe Wheeler" <sitsofe@...il.com>,
"KY Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc: "James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
"Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>, "Hannes Reinecke" <hare@...e.de>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devel@...uxdriverproject.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3] scsi: Add Hyper-V logical block provisioning quirks
> Is it OK to replace a scsi_level of SCSI-2 with SCSI_SPC_3? Additionally is it also OK to force
> SCSI_SPC_3 on Hyper-V 2008?
I would patch the driver accordingly to force the SPC-3 flag.
For a Win2k8 host, I don't know what the side effects are, so it's safe to say it's not a good idea to
Force SCSI_SPC_3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists