linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 0/3] scsi: Add Hyper-V logical block provisioning quirks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:19:31 -0700
From:	"Jeff Leung" <jleung@...networks.ca>
To:	"Sitsofe Wheeler" <sitsofe@...il.com>,
	"KY Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc:	"James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
	"Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>, "Hannes Reinecke" <hare@...e.de>,
	<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devel@...uxdriverproject.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3] scsi: Add Hyper-V logical block provisioning quirks

> Is it OK to replace a scsi_level of SCSI-2 with SCSI_SPC_3? Additionally is it also OK to force
> SCSI_SPC_3 on Hyper-V 2008?

I would patch the driver accordingly to force the SPC-3 flag.

For a Win2k8 host, I don't know what the side effects are, so it's safe to say it's not a good idea to
Force SCSI_SPC_3