lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5445FA5F.8010407@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:47:03 +0530
From:	Varka Bhadram <varkabhadram@...il.com>
To:	Ankit Jindal <ankit.jindal@...aro.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"patches@....com" <patches@....com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Tushar Jagad <tushar.jagad@...aro.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] uio: Add X-Gene QMTM UIO driver

On 10/21/2014 11:46 AM, Ankit Jindal wrote:
> On 21 October 2014 11:34, Varka Bhadram <varkabhadram@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 10/21/2014 11:26 AM, Ankit Jindal wrote:
>>> The Applied Micro X-Gene SOC has on-chip QMTM (Queue manager
>>> and Traffic manager) which is hardware based Queue or Ring
>>> manager. This QMTM device can be used in conjunction with
>>> other devices such as DMA Engine, Ethernet, Security Engine,
>>> etc to assign work based on queues or rings.
>>>
>>> This patch allows user space access to X-Gene QMTM device.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Jindal <ankit.jindal@...aro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Jagad <tushar.jagad@...aro.org>
>>
>> (...)
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> +static int qmtm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> +       struct uio_info *info;
>>> +       struct uio_qmtm_dev *qmtm_dev;
>>> +       struct resource *csr;
>>> +       struct resource *fabric;
>>> +       struct resource qpool;
>>> +       unsigned int num_queues;
>>> +       unsigned int devid;
>>> +       phandle qpool_phandle;
>>> +       struct device_node *qpool_node;
>>> +       int ret;
>>> +
>>> +       qmtm_dev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct uio_qmtm_dev),
>>> +                               GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +       if (!qmtm_dev)
>>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +       qmtm_dev->info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info),
>>> GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +       if (!qmtm_dev->info)
>>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +       /* Power on qmtm in case its not done as part of boot-loader */
>>> +       qmtm_dev->qmtm_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>>> +       if (IS_ERR(qmtm_dev->qmtm_clk)) {
>>> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get clock\n");
>>> +               ret = PTR_ERR(qmtm_dev->qmtm_clk);
>>> +               return ret;
>>> +       }
>>> +
>>> +       csr = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>> +       if (!csr) {
>>> +               ret = -ENODEV;
>>> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No QMTM CSR resource specified\n");
>>> +               goto out_err;
>>> +       }
>>> +
>>
>> This error check is not required. *csr* is checked in
>> devm_ioremap_resource().
> I think its better to do sanity check before calling any function.

It will be the duplication of code for sanity check. This sanity check is happening
with devm_ioremap_resource(). No need to check it explicitly.

>>> +       if (!csr->start) {
>>> +               ret = -EINVAL;
>>> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid CSR resource\n");
>>> +               goto out_err;
>>> +       }
>>> +
>>> +       fabric = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
>>> +       if (!fabric) {
>>> +               ret = -ENODEV;
>>> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No QMTM Fabric resource
>>> specified\n");
>>> +               goto out_err;
>>> +       }
>>> +
>>
>> same
> We do not ioremap this address.

Ok..

-- 
Regards,
Varka Bhadram.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ