[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWrXaJnfuyxOP-4zQyYJwrho6XvbTcjtwNK4pgoSH9PFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:53:04 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init: Remove CONFIG_INIT_FALLBACK
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> CONFIG_INIT_FALLBACK adds config bloat without an obvious use case
> that makes it worth keeping around. Delete it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> ---
>
> Bring on the blame :)
>
> init/Kconfig | 16 ----------------
> init/main.c | 5 -----
> 2 files changed, 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index ebbd5846478e..e84c6423a2e5 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1299,22 +1299,6 @@ source "usr/Kconfig"
>
> endif
>
> -config INIT_FALLBACK
> - bool "Fall back to defaults if init= parameter is bad"
> - default y
> - help
The above is not in mainline, nor in -next?
Seems it only exists in a patch series you sent yourself?
Confused...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists