linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] mfd: max77693: Map charger device to its own of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141021102702.GH26842@x1>
Date:	Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:27:02 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] mfd: max77693: Map charger device to its own
 of_node

On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> On wto, 2014-10-21 at 11:17 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > 
> > > On pon, 2014-10-20 at 16:06 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Add a "maxim,max77693-charger" of_compatible to the mfd_cell so the MFD
> > > > > child device (the charger) will have its own of_node set. This will be
> > > > > used by the max77693 charger driver in next patches to obtain battery
> > > > > configuration from DTS.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/mfd/max77693.c | 5 ++++-
> > > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/max77693.c b/drivers/mfd/max77693.c
> > > > > index cf008f45968c..2277a11b6629 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/mfd/max77693.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/max77693.c
> > > > > @@ -43,7 +43,10 @@
> > > > >  
> > > > >  static const struct mfd_cell max77693_devs[] = {
> > > > >  	{ .name = "max77693-pmic", },
> > > > > -	{ .name = "max77693-charger", },
> > > > > +	{
> > > > > +		.name = "max77693-charger",
> > > > > +		.of_compatible = "maxim,max77693-charger",
> > > > > +	},
> > > > >  	{ .name = "max77693-muic", },
> > > > >  	{ .name = "max77693-haptic", },
> > > > >  	{
> > > > 
> > > > I'm guessing this can be applied separately?
> > > 
> > > Yes. Patch 3/5 also (it adds necessary defines and symbols for
> > > chargers).
> > 
> > I'll take this patch, but I think 3/5 is required by some of the other
> > patches in the set, no?
> 
> Yes, it is required by 4/5 (charger driver).

Okay, so it must go in with the others then.

I need Acks for that.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/