linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ftracetest: add kprobes on ftrace testcase

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141021115928.GB4161@osiris>
Date:	Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:59:28 +0200
From:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ftracetest: add kprobes on ftrace testcase

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:21:05PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/10/20 19:52), Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > Add a kprobes on ftrace testcase. The testcase verifies that
> > - enabling and disabling function tracing works on a function which
> >   already contains a dynamic kprobe
> > - adding and removing a dynamic kprobe works on a function which is
> >   already enabled for function tracing
> > 
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>

Hi Masami,

thanks! How should these two patches go upstream?

Thanks,
Heiko

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/