[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54464D64.9090409@hitachi.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:11:16 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] kprobes: introduce weak arch_check_ftrace_location()
helper function
(2014/10/21 21:00), Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:30:56PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2014/10/21 17:30), Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>> Introduce weak arch_check_ftrace_location() helper function which
>>> architectures can override in order to implement handling of kprobes
>>> on function tracer call sites on their own, without depending on
>>> common code or implementing the KPROBES_ON_FTRACE feature.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Ok, thanks!
>
> If there are no objections, this patch and the s390 only patch will
> go upstream via the s390 tree. Is that ok?
Yeah, I think it's OK for me.
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists