[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANLsYkziaqnVkOGpnzEHLiS35JHc2Sd_yTz_ruWpwE=JMZyvxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:52:49 +0200
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Neil Zhang <zhangwm@...vell.com>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
On 20 October 2014 11:20, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:16:16AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> On 20/10/14 09:46, Neil Zhang wrote:
>> > Will, I prefer to check always-on field under PMU node to check
>> > whether we need Save/restore them.
>> >
>> But how do you handle it for different idle states. e.g. if CPU is in
>> retention, PMU's *might be* retained. Also I don't think PMUs will be
>> placed in "always-on" power domain like timers. So using "always-on"
>> sounds incorrect to me.
>
> Adding Mathieu to CC, since I spoke to him at LPC about this and he was
> talking about implementing proper PM domain descriptions for coresight
> components.
>
> Will
Will is correct - it's in the pipeline now. Just hang tight.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists