linux-kernel - Re: lockdep splat in CPU hotplug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141021145809.GA799@home.goodmis.org>
Date:	Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:58:10 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lockdep splat in CPU hotplug

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 01:09:04PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am seeing the lockdep report below when resuming from suspend-to-disk 
> with current Linus' tree (c2661b80609).
> 
> The reason for CCing Ingo and Peter is that I can't make any sense of one 
> of the stacktraces lockdep is providing.
> 
> Please have a look at the very first stacktrace in the dump, where lockdep 
> is trying to explain where cpu_hotplug.lock#2 has been acquired. It seems 
> to imply that cpuidle_pause() is taking cpu_hotplug.lock, but that's not 
> the case at all.
> 
> What am I missing?
> 


> 
> -> #1 (cpu_hotplug.lock#2){+.+.+.}:
>         [<ffffffff81099fac>] lock_acquire+0xac/0x130
>         [<ffffffff815b9f2c>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5c/0x3b0
>         [<ffffffff81491892>] cpuidle_pause+0x12/0x30
>         [<ffffffff81402314>] dpm_suspend_noirq+0x44/0x340
>         [<ffffffff81402958>] dpm_suspend_end+0x38/0x80
>         [<ffffffff810a07bd>] hibernation_snapshot+0xcd/0x370
>         [<ffffffff810a1248>] hibernate+0x168/0x210
>         [<ffffffff8109e9b4>] state_store+0xe4/0xf0
>         [<ffffffff813003ef>] kobj_attr_store+0xf/0x20
>         [<ffffffff8121e9a3>] sysfs_kf_write+0x43/0x60
>         [<ffffffff8121e287>] kernfs_fop_write+0xe7/0x170
>         [<ffffffff811a7342>] vfs_write+0xb2/0x1f0
>         [<ffffffff811a7da4>] SyS_write+0x44/0xb0
>         [<ffffffff815be856>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Yeah, this backtrace looks totally bogus. Unless there's some magic going on
with grabbing the get_online_cpus here?

Could you send your config. Maybe it has to do with some debug magic?

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/