| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:32:12 -0700
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dell-wmi: Update code for processing WMI events
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:15:24AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> WMI buffer can contains more events. First value in buffer is length of event
> followed by data of specified length. After that is next length and next data.
> When length is zero then there is no more events in bufffer.
>
> This patch adds support for processing all events in buffer (not only first)
> and parse more event types (not only hotkey events). Because of variable length
> of events sometimes BIOS fills more hotkeys (or other values) into single WMI
> event. In this case this patch process also these multiple hotkeys (and not
> only first one).
>
> Some event types are just ignored because kernel is not interested for them
> (e.g. NIC Link status, battery unplug, ...).
>
> This patch is based on DSDT table from Dell Latitude E6440. Code should be
> backward compatible so will process other events of old types same as before
> this patch.
>
> This patch also fixes problem when in kernel log are written messages about
> unknown WMI events. Now all know events are parsed and those which are not
> interesting for kernel are dropped without unknown message.
This should probably be done in a separate patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
> Tested-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Well yes, I should hope so ;-)
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi.c | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi.c
> index 25721bf..3d15949 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi.c
> @@ -145,11 +145,35 @@ static const u16 bios_to_linux_keycode[256] __initconst = {
>
> static struct input_dev *dell_wmi_input_dev;
>
> +static void dell_wmi_process_key(int reported_key)
> +{
> + const struct key_entry *key;
> +
> + key = sparse_keymap_entry_from_scancode(dell_wmi_input_dev,
> + reported_key);
> + if (!key) {
> + pr_info("Unknown key %x pressed\n", reported_key);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + pr_debug("Key %x pressed\n", reported_key);
> +
> + /* Don't report brightness notifications that will also come via ACPI */
> + if ((key->keycode == KEY_BRIGHTNESSUP ||
> + key->keycode == KEY_BRIGHTNESSDOWN) && acpi_video)
> + return;
> +
> + sparse_keymap_report_entry(dell_wmi_input_dev, key, 1, true);
> +}
> +
> static void dell_wmi_notify(u32 value, void *context)
> {
> struct acpi_buffer response = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
> union acpi_object *obj;
> acpi_status status;
> + acpi_size buffer_size;
> + u16 *buffer_entry, *buffer_end;
> + int len, i;
>
> status = wmi_get_event_data(value, &response);
> if (status != AE_OK) {
> @@ -158,44 +182,117 @@ static void dell_wmi_notify(u32 value, void *context)
> }
>
> obj = (union acpi_object *)response.pointer;
> + if (!obj) {
> + pr_info("no response\n");
> + return;
> + }
If you intend to print this, it should probably be a bit more informative. Is
"info" the right level here? I would imagine either WARN if this was a bad
thing, or DEBUG if this is more for debugging the driver.
> - if (obj && obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
> - const struct key_entry *key;
> - int reported_key;
> - u16 *buffer_entry = (u16 *)obj->buffer.pointer;
> - int buffer_size = obj->buffer.length/2;
> -
> - if (buffer_size >= 2 && dell_new_hk_type && buffer_entry[1] != 0x10) {
> - pr_info("Received unknown WMI event (0x%x)\n",
> - buffer_entry[1]);
> - kfree(obj);
> - return;
> - }
> + if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
> + pr_info("bad response type %x\n", obj->type);
> + kfree(obj);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + pr_debug("Received WMI event (%*ph)\n",
> + obj->buffer.length, obj->buffer.pointer);
>
> - if (buffer_size >= 3 && (dell_new_hk_type || buffer_entry[1] == 0x0))
> - reported_key = (int)buffer_entry[2];
> + buffer_entry = (u16 *)obj->buffer.pointer;
> + buffer_size = obj->buffer.length/2;
> +
> + if (!dell_new_hk_type) {
> + if (buffer_size >= 3 && buffer_entry[1] == 0x0)
> + dell_wmi_process_key(buffer_entry[2]);
> else if (buffer_size >= 2)
> - reported_key = (int)buffer_entry[1] & 0xffff;
> - else {
> + dell_wmi_process_key(buffer_entry[1]);
Why can we drop the 0xffff mask now?
> + else
> pr_info("Received unknown WMI event\n");
> - kfree(obj);
> - return;
> + kfree(obj);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + buffer_end = buffer_entry + buffer_size;
> +
> + while (buffer_entry < buffer_end) {
> +
> + len = buffer_entry[0];
> + if (len == 0)
> + break;
> +
> + len++;
> +
Why increment len here? Are you trying to avoid a "len + 1" in the comparisons
below? If so, is using "len * 2" in the debug message below correct? Please
clarify.
> + if (buffer_entry+len > buffer_end) {
See coding style documentation on operators. Please run patches through
checkpatch.
> + pr_info("Invalid length of WMI event\n");
info doesn't see correct here either.
> + break;
> }
>
> - key = sparse_keymap_entry_from_scancode(dell_wmi_input_dev,
> - reported_key);
> - if (!key) {
> - pr_info("Unknown key %x pressed\n", reported_key);
> - } else if ((key->keycode == KEY_BRIGHTNESSUP ||
> - key->keycode == KEY_BRIGHTNESSDOWN) && acpi_video) {
> - /* Don't report brightness notifications that will also
> - * come via ACPI */
> - ;
> - } else {
> - sparse_keymap_report_entry(dell_wmi_input_dev, key,
> - 1, true);
> + pr_debug("Process buffer (%*ph)\n", len*2, buffer_entry);
> +
> + switch (buffer_entry[1]) {
> + case 0x00:
> + for (i = 2; i < len; ++i) {
> + switch (buffer_entry[i]) {
> + case 0xe043:
> + /* NIC Link is Up */
> + pr_debug("NIC Link is Up\n");
> + break;
> + case 0xe044:
> + /* NIC Link is Down */
> + pr_debug("NIC Link is Down\n");
> + break;
> + case 0xe045:
> + /* Unknown event but defined in DSDT */
> + default:
> + /* Unknown event */
> + pr_info("Unknown WMI event type 0x00: "
> + "0x%x\n", (int)buffer_entry[i]);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + break;
> + case 0x10:
> + /* Keys pressed */
> + for (i = 2; i < len; ++i)
> + dell_wmi_process_key(buffer_entry[i]);
> + break;
> + case 0x11:
> + for (i = 2; i < len; ++i) {
> + switch (buffer_entry[i]) {
> + case 0xfff0:
> + /* Battery unplugged */
> + pr_debug("Battery unplugged\n");
> + break;
> + case 0xfff1:
> + /* Battery inserted */
> + pr_debug("Battery inserted\n");
> + break;
> + case 0x01e1:
> + case 0x02ea:
> + case 0x02eb:
> + case 0x02ec:
> + case 0x02f6:
> + /* Keyboard backlight level changed */
> + pr_debug("Keyboard backlight level "
> + "changed\n");
> + break;
> + default:
> + /* Unknown event */
> + pr_info("Unknown WMI event type 0x11: "
> + "0x%x\n", (int)buffer_entry[i]);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + break;
> + default:
> + /* Unknown event */
> + pr_info("Unknown WMI event type 0x%x\n",
> + (int)buffer_entry[1]);
> + break;
> }
> +
> + buffer_entry += len;
> +
> }
> +
> kfree(obj);
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists