[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <544758AB.3060100@openwrt.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:11:39 +0200
From: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
To: eunb.song@...sung.com, "ralf@...ux-mips.org" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
CC: "linux-mips@...ux-mips.org" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: add arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() function
On 22/10/2014 08:54, Eunbong Song wrote:
>
>> Hi Eubong,
>
>> one small question inline ...
>
>>> +void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(bool); +#define
>>> arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace
>
>> What is the purpose of this define ? is this maybe a leftover from
>> some regex/cleanups ?
>
> Hi John.
> Actually, I just follow the same function of sparc architecture.
> You can find this in arch/sparc/include/asm/irq_64.h as below
>
> void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(bool);
> #define arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace
>
> I guess this is used for conditional compile.
> See below.
> include/linux/nmi.h
> #ifdef arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace
> static inline bool trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void)
> {
> arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(true);
>
> return true;
> }
> static inline bool trigger_allbutself_cpu_backtrace(void)
> {
> arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(false);
> return true;
> }
> #else
> static inline bool trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void)
> {
> return false;
> }
> static inline bool trigger_allbutself_cpu_backtrace(void)
> {
> return false;
> }
> #endif
>
> Thanks.
>> John
>
i don't see how this is required for conditional compiles. the code
define a->a which is bogus i think.
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists