[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141022134416.GA15602@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:44:16 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com,
mgorman@...e.de, oleg@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com,
minchan@...nel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dave@...olabs.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/6] mm: VMA sequence count
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:15:54PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:53:04PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > Em, no. In this case change_protection() will not touch the pte, since
> > it's pte_none() and the pte_same() check will pass just fine.
>
> Oh, that's what you meant. Yes that's a problem, yes vm_page_prot
> needs wrapping too.
Maybe also vm_policy, is there anything else that can change while a vma
lives?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists